|
 |
Peter
Hawkins enlisted into the RAAF, 10 Feb 1967, served as
an Airfield Defence Guard at Ubon, Thailand, arriving
15th Dec 1967 returning to Australia after 6 months on
compassionate grounds. On return he remustered as a
Physical Training Instructor serving in numerous units
as expected of a long serving member of the RAAF and
then he
eventually remustered again finishing his career as
a Warrant Officer, Discipline. WO(D) |
|
An Airman of
such standing and integrity, someone young Airmen &
women could look up to and to aspire to become, a role
model for the young officers to emulate, someone who's
leadership they could epitomize.
A WO(D) is
the equivalent of a Regimental Sergeant Major (RSM) in
the Army and above we have described some of the attributes
that can/should be expected from such a person.
Warrant
Officers' are often charged with the duty of Guardian,
preserving and enshrining the traditions and history of
their Unit and Service. Such a person only receives this
appointment because he was held in high esteem. One
would think that after taking the uniform off he would
have maintained such dignity.
Not so for
Peter Stanley Hawkins, it is alleged that on occasions,
he has embellished his service with stories that are far
fetched but, as these cannot be substantiated we will
not go into details, unless of course a reader of this
can confirm and substantiate any such stories.
He claims to
have served in South Vietnam as seen on an application
to transfer from one RSL Sub Branch to another below.

Peter
Hawkins, you have been caught out wearing the Vietnam
Medal and AASM with clasps Vietnam which, you are not
entitled to. You have been caught wearing what appears
to be Tin at the end of your medals rack as well. If you
must wear tin to enhance your service then the
appropriate area to wear them would be on the right
breast and well below any NOK medals you may be able to
wear.

Why would a
man with such an exemplary career would resort to
embellishing and tarnishing his long service is
something we here at ANZMI cannot fathom. It is the
actions of a fool, one who needs help. If you need
to dress yourself up to be something you are not after a
35 year career it possibly indicates a low esteem and
dissatisfaction within yourself.
You should
have been proud to wear the Australian Active Service
Medal with clasp Thailand, the Defence Force Service
Medal with 20, 25, 30, & 35 year clasps and the National
Medal. There should be no reason to embellish your
career as those medals speak for themselves.
Peter
Stanley Hawkins, you once were a leading example of
integrity, a founding member of the Blue Eagles where
you are held in high regard. You have let your peers
down and you have insulted veterans who do not need to
embellish themselves.
Under the
Defence Act 1903 you were appointed to the rank of
Warrant Officer and to carefully and diligently
discharge your duty as required by Military Law and to
conduct yourself in a manner to ensure respect for
lawful authority and to uphold the honourable tradition
of the rank, "Warrant Officer".
Under the
Defence Act, something you would have advised on and
were required to administer, it is an offence to wear
medals one is not entitled to. By wearing these medals
you are not entitled to, you have shown contempt and
disregard to all your former peers and fellow veterans
and dishonoured yourself. Remove these medals from your
rack before you perpetuate your dishonour.
Peter Stanley Hawkins was sent a letter
from ANZMI asking him to prove his entitlement to wear
these medals. He was also given an opportunity to repent
and apologise to the veteran community. He did neither
instead he chose to ignore the letter.
Peter now
resides here and the "war service" he claims is now
available to the world.
This is published in the
public interest, particularly that of the Vietnam
Veteran Community. All information presented here is
fact and the truth obtained from Service records. |