With regard to our cases on both John and Gerard
Buchtmann we have received further information
regarding the medals they are wearing. The blue
and white medal which we have recorded as the
Granville Train Disaster Medal is incorrect. It
is in fact the 25th Anniversary
Granville Train Disaster Medal.
The original medal had a hand stitched ribbon
similar in colour to the United Nations Medal
ribbon.

When John and Gerard had their medals Court
mounted which means the medals are mounted in
such a way that the medals are next to each
other and do not move, whereas the old method of
mounting medals had them over lapping each other
and they would swing as you marched.
The ribbon the Buchtmann twins used was the UN
ribbon for their anniversary medals and they
never served with the United Nations.

In actual fact, no medal was ever issued for
that disaster, only a medallion by the New South
Wales Government was issued.


National Service
Both twins wear the Conscript Medal which is
what we refer to as a tin medal as it is an
un-official medal. John however wears the
official commemorative National Service Medal.
We cannot find a list of all those that were
called up for National Service and We cannot say
whether he was officially awarded that medal.
On their service records there is no mention
that they were serving with the Citizen Military
forces (CMF) in lieu of full time National
service of two years. At the time, which I know
from personal experience as I was in the CMF
prior to joining the Australian Regular Army, we
were advised that if you registered for National
Service, you could do six years CMF and not be
called up.
We cannot get a copy of the original Act which
states that as it has been repealed and the only
copy of the Act on line is the Act dated 1971
which had a large number of amendments to some
sections and some were sections were repealed.
We did manage to find a document from National
Archives which shows that in 1964 the Act had an
amendment to make it six years CMF and also
information on the Australian War Memorial web
site which backs this up. This was done to stop
persons joining the CMF before the ballot was
drawn and then resigning from the CMF after
finding out they had not been called up.
http://www.awm.gov.au/encyclopedia/viet_app.asp
Encyclopedia
Appendix: The national service scheme, 1964-72
by Sue Langford
Two provisions enabled youths to enlist in the
Citizen Forces rather than undertake national
service. They could enlist before their
twentieth birthday and give at least one year's
effective service, and were required to continue
to give a further five years' service.
Alternatively, they could join the Citizen
Forces before the ballot for their age group
and, provided they were accepted for service in
the Citizen Forces, were obliged to serve for
six years.
The Government soon became aware of a loophole
in these provisions. If balloted out, youths
were able to resign from the Citizen Forces
immediately afterwards. The Government soon
closed the loophole and from 8 December 1965
registrants who had enlisted in the Citizen
Forces had to serve a total of six years
irrespective of whether they were balloted in or
out. In addition, youths who did not serve
efficiently in the Citizen Forces were liable
for call-up.
The following document is from the National
archives web site.

As you will see from the following information,
both had to register for National Service as
their birthday was on 6 December 1945 and ballot
they would have been in was drawn on 10
September 1965.
Birthdates drawn in the second National Service
ballot: 10 September 1965
Men included in the ballot who were born in the
period 1 July 1945 to 31 December 1945.
July 3, 6, 7, 8, 16, 22, 25, 26, 31
August 3, 6, 9, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 20, 21,
22, 23, 25, 26
September 2, 4, 5, 6, 14, 17, 21, 25, 26
October 2, 4, 5, 6, 10, 11, 13, 16, 17, 23, 25,
29
November 3, 4, 12, 14, 15, 16, 22, 24, 27
December 6, 10, 12, 14, 17, 18, 19, 21, 24, 25,
26, 28, 31
John enlisted in the CMF on 20 September 1965,
10 days after the ballot was drawn for two years
only, and not the required six years if he was
serving in the CMF in lieu of full time National
Service if he had been called up.
Gerard enlisted in the CMF for two periods 3
September 1963 to 10 December 1964 and 6
September 1965 to 31 August 1967, notice he
re-enlisted 4 days before the ballot was drawn
which means he did not do the required six years
in lieu of National Service if he had been
called up.
The amendment for six years service was made on
8 December 1965 and had they been called up and
serving in the CMF in lieu of full time National
Service it would have been recorded in their
service records as they were both in the CMF at
the time of the amendment and would have had to
change their time of enlistment to six years.
On the evidence provided, we will leave it up to
you the reader, to decide if they had in actual
fact been called up for national service.
Regarding our case on John William Buchtmann,
you will notice that in the photograph at the
start of the case page, John is wearing a set of
gold wings. At the time of the investigation we
could not identify the wings. Thanks to a reader
of our web site we have received information on
what the wings are.
We also received information the John is or was
a pilot. He is not wearing the wings of either a
Private Pilot or a Commercial Pilot, but John
has the audacity to wear the wings issued to a
lot of brave men who flew aircraft during World
War 2 under the RAF Bomber Command as Path
Finders. These men would fly ahead of the main
bomber group and mark the target with incendiary
bombs to start fires on the target so the main
group had a marker to aim for and improve the
chances of dropping the bombs on target at
night.
If john was a private pilot he should be wearing
pilot wings similar to the one below.

But no John has purchased for some reason the
Path Finder Wings which can only be worn by men
who served as Path Finders during WW2 and then
only when issued a certificate to authorise the
wearing of such wings. The wings are worn on the
right breast pocket of the RAF or RAAF tunic
below the medal ribbons.


John has by wearing those wings shown no respect
to the brave men that earned the right to wear
those wings and especially to those that never
returned from their missions. One Australian
RAAF pilot who earned those wings was the late
Air Marshall Sir James Anthony Rowland, AC, KBE,
DFC, AFC, KStJ who was a past RAAF Chief and
Governor of New South Wells.
How much lower can this person get by insulting
the men and relatives of those who earned them?